In a controversy that has reignited long‑standing scrutiny of their charitable work, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing fresh criticism over their first Archewell Impact Report, with critics claiming the couple failed to clearly account for roughly $10 million of the $13 million the Archewell Foundation reportedly raised. The nonprofit’s own figures show that between 2020 and 2022 Archewell raised about $13 million and distributed approximately $3 million in grants, leaving the balance of around $10 million unspent in the report’s initial public snapshot.
.jpg)
Skeptics seized on this gap, arguing that the foundation did not adequately explain what happened to the remaining money or whether it was held in reserve, used for overhead, or allocated to future projects. YouTube exposés and social‑media commentators have repeatedly highlighted the headline‑ready question: “Where is the $10 million?” suggesting that the couple’s nonprofit might be more about image‑building than transparent philanthropy. Some critics also point to the high cost of running a celebrity‑driven operation—staff, legal, PR, and travel—that may have consumed a large share of the pot before grants even began to flow.
Supporters of Archewell counter that the impact report itself states the remaining funds are being set aside for future charitable grants, emphasizing that properly managed foundations often spend over several years rather than all at once. Follow‑up reporting by mainstream outlets has also challenged the “missing millions” angle, explaining that the Archewell Foundation’s reporting and public‑charity structures align with standard U.S. nonprofit practice, and that the “$10 million gap” is misleading without context about grant timelines and administrative costs.
Still, the headline endures because it fits a persistent narrative: that the Sussexes’ charity work, like their media deals, exists in a gray zone where public storytelling and private finance blur. Whether the $10 million is genuinely under scrutiny or simply misunderstood, the story keeps feeding the public’s suspicion that the royal couple’s “Archewell” name hides more questions than it answers.